Posts Tagged ‘Tenacity’

An obligation to influence

15 May 2009

On 28 January 1986, the space shuttle Challenger exploded upon take-off because an O-ring seal on the right booster rocket leaked fuel, which was ignited by the rockets. Seven astronauts died and a $1.7 billion orbiter was lost.

images

The shuttle was launched in the coldest weather since the program began, and NASA and Morton Thiokol engineers had already noticed that O-rings tended to leak at sub-freezing temperatures. The temperature at launch was forecasted to be between 26-29 degrees Fahrenheit. In the days leading up to the launch, some of the engineers tried to convince NASA management to delay the launch.

2003_space_shuttle_columbia_disaster

On 1 February 2003, the shuttle Columbia burned up on re-entry because the heat shield had been severely damaged when fuel tank insulation foam struck the orbiter during launch. After the launch, several engineers suspected damage but could not bring themselves to request expensive satellite photos of the shuttle to examine the damage and see if emergency repairs were needed. Once again, seven astronauts and an expensive orbiter were lost.

In both cases, engineers inside NASA knew in advance there was a problem. The very peril they imagined came true and people died.

One way to look at these disasters: The engineers were not influential enough.

Many folks think of influence as something they want in their work life, community activities, and personal lives. They have a legitimate, inherent need to help improve the world and to do that through affecting others’ behavior.

That’s all well and good. But what about the times when the stakes are high—lives are on the line? In these situations, you must be effective. You must influence.

You have an obligation to be influential. Influence is no longer a wish or a choice, it is an obligation.

This obligation extends not only to when lives on are on the line, but also when people will be hurt, laws will be broken, massive resources will be lost, or mission or values will be violated.

All the more reason to work on improving your influence skills so that you are able to influence when it really counts — when the stakes are the highest.

Keep on truckin’

4 August 2008

In the late 60s and early 70s, an R. Crumb illustration Keep on Truckin’ showed three men in a row walking with outstretched front legs. It inspired people to keep going in spite of setbacks. (Or, at least, that’s how I interpreted it.)

I think about that phrase Keep on Truckin’ when it comes to changing a work relationship or an organization. It takes hard work. And there are setbacks. And, to make matters worse, you have to keep working at it over time.

It’s not easy, and it requires you to stretch yourself in ways that don’t always feel good. You have a part in creating every situation you’re in; changing the situation means changing your behavior.

The payoff for all that effort rarely comes when you expect it, and often not in the way you expect it. But it usually comes—if you keep at it.

In Good to Great, Jim Collins calls this pushing on the flywheel. Imagine a massive cast iron wheel that you can move only an inch or so at a time. You keep pushing, again and again, until it starts to rotate. Keep at it over weeks and months and years, and it starts to gain momentum. Then, and only then, will you start to experience the breakthroughs. They come because you kept pushing on the flywheel.

Many of us expect results too soon and give up on pushing the flywheel too early. Actually, if it is the right thing to push, we should probably expect to be pushing it forever. So, pick your flywheel carefully!

What is the flywheel you’re pushing on?