Posts Tagged ‘Intentions’

Which role are you taking?

1 July 2009

The influence leader faces a dilemma: When you are trying to advance a project, do you take the role of a convener/facilitator or that of an advocate?

These are distinct roles that are both important to getting things done. But the influence leader that carelessly mixes the two will quickly find themselves in trouble and the larger conversation in tatters.

For example, suppose you are trying to set direction for your project or organization. Two things need to happen at the same time. First, you and the people you are working with (and working for) need to have a complete discussion. That takes planning and conscious effort. Second, you need to step up and let people know what you’re thinking.

If you push a position when you should be shepherding the process, people will distrust your motives and resent your heavy-handedness. If you fail to take a position when people want to know what you think, you’ll look wishy-washy and uncommitted.

What are these roles?

As convener/facilitator, your task is to help everyone involved to have the fullest, most productive conversation needed to achieve results. You help frame the questions, you make space for everyone to participate, you make sure people are heard, and you ensure that decisions are made in a way that everyone can support.Your primary focus is the process of coming to a decision.

As an advocate, you’ve got your own ideas and opinions about what should be done and what should be decided. In fact, folks may be looking to you to weigh in with your perspective. You have an investment in the outcome of the process, so your primary focus is there.

You aren’t doing your job if you pick one of the roles to the exclusion of the other. Since you cannot just pick one, you need to pick both.

Both? Yes, you need to shift between roles, making sure the discussion is on track and also weighing in with your opinion.

The trick is to state clearly about which role you’re taking at a given time. Let people know that you are balancing two distinct roles.

If you are clear with yourself and others about which role you’re in, you’ll be able to manage the dilemma and keep yourself from getting stuck.

Mind the gap!

12 May 2009

Mind the gap! That’s the warning on the London Underground to be careful of the gap between the subway car and the platform.

It’s also a useful reminder of the sometimes wide gap between what we intend to tell people and how others receive our message or perceive us. We may think that our intentions are clear, but sometimes we find that they have been badly misinterpreted by others.

If we’re lucky, we figure out there’s a gap and can fix it. Unfortunately, sometimes we don’t learn about the gap in time.

Here is a cautionary tale that illustrates the gap between what we intend to do and how we are perceived by others. It was contributed by a reader named “Nanner.”

One of my earlier City jobs was in the Personnel Department and one year I was graced with coordinating the budget.  This was back in the day of 80-80 printouts.  The department head and his deputy would go out for drinks after work and talk about the budget.  My role was to stay in the office (no OT) and wait for them to come back.  I’d white out the old numbers and put in the new so the update could be run for the next day.  You might imagine that I soon tired of this routine.  I thought if I could be at the table when they were making their decisions, it would save time for me.

So how to get at the table?  I knew the direct approach was unlikely to be effective.  So one evening before five o’clock, I walked down the hall saying, “Anyone want to go out for a drink after work?”  Needless to say, that did not have the desired result.

Fast forward to a promotional opportunity.  I applied, was interviewed, and no decision was ever announced.  I figured to heck with these folks and found a better job at another department.  At my exit interview, I learned that I had given the impression that I was more interested in going out for a drink than I was in doing my work!

That’s when I learned about unsaid expectations - metrics that people are measured by without even knowing it.  I decided that was terribly unfair.  So I have been hyperconscious ever since about making my expectations for working with others very clear.  That has become especially important as I moved into supervisory and managerial roles.  It has worked well.

Nanner’s strategy of concealing her intentions backfired. She invited people for drinks rather than asking directly for what she needed. She now clearly negotiates expectations with others to reduce the chances that each other’s intentions will be misunderstood. This practice of hers dramatically reduces “the gap.”